Canada Post Corporation Sues GEOLYTICA INC. c.o.b. GEOCODER.CA Over Postal Code Data Copyright


see source

Canada Post says Geolytica's alleged copyright infringment means 'Canada Post has suffered and will continue to suffer a loss.' © 2012 Canada Post Corporation

Canada Post has filed a lawsuit against an Ottawa-based geographic data company, alleging that the firm’s collection of postal codes infringes on a copyright that Canada Post owns.

However, the defendant company, Geolytica Inc., denies the allegations and calls Canada Post’s copyright claim an “absurd” one that would lead to copyright infringement on a “massive, near-universal scale” if recognized.

In a statement of claim filed in Federal Court in March, Canada Post claims it is the owner of copyright in an “original compilation of geographic, operational and postal data” called the CPC Database. It says Geolytica has infringed that copyright by “producing and reproducing, without consent,… the CPC Database and substantial parts thereof in course of the development, update, distribution and sale of the defendant’s dataset products.”

The Crown corporation alleges that those actions mean “the defendant has made and will continue to make profits and Canada Post has suffered and will continue to suffer a loss.” Canada Post normally charges a fee to license its postal code database, but it would not divulge to CBC News how much, saying it varies by case.

The statement of claim says Canada Post is seeking court action to:

The lawsuit was filed in Federal Court by Canada Post in March, 2012
  • Permanently stop Geolytica from distributing postal code data.
  • Recover damages linked to the alleged infringement.

The postal service didn’t specify the amount of the damages it is seeking. Nor would it comment specifically on its claims. However, in an email statement, it said shipping requires accurate, up-to-date data and “it’s a lot of time and money to get it right.”

Geolytica is being legally represented by the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, a technology law, policy and advocacy group based at the University of Ottawa. It filed a statement of defence Thursday denying the allegations and questioning Canada Post’s copyright claim.

Database crowdsourced, Geolytica says

The defence statement says Geolytica has been independently compiling its own database of postal codes through crowdsourcing since 2004, by asking people to enter their postal codes when they used the company’s free website,, to look up the longitude and latitude of their street addresses. Geolytica now provides the data free for non-profit use, but offers fee-based services to commercial users. The company denies accessing or copying Canada Post’s own database.

However, CIPPIC also alleges that postal codes are facts, not creative works, and therefore can’t be copyrighted.

“The plaintiff’s claim to copyright in the CPC Database would lead to absurd results,” the statement says.

“Individual Canadians and businesses regularly and frequently collect and use postal codes in address books, mailing lists, customer lists, supplier lists and an infinite variety of lists. If the plaintiff’s assertion of copyright in the CPC Database were well founded, all of these collections of addresses and the postal codes therein would reproduce parts of the CPC Database and so would infringe copyright.”

Michael Geist, a University of Ottawa law professor whose research specializes in internet and copyright issues, wrote on his blog Friday that other marketers that have independently developed and marketed databases containing postal code information could face similar claims from Canada Post.

“Given the government’s emphasis on open data,” he added, “the federal government may have something to say about Canada Post’s efforts to restrict public compilation and distribution of postal code information.”

Geist acknowledged he sits on CIPPIC’s advisory board, but said he hasn’t been involved in the Geolytica case.

Part of the Geolytica’s defence:

The Public Interest
34. In the further alternative, Geolytica also pleads a defense of public interest. Canadians rightly consider postal codes as facts that are a part of their street addresses and so part of the public domain. We write them on letters, submit them in online forms, and regularly give them out to help others find our addresses using online mapping services. Businesses and non-profit organizations compile addresses
with postal codes into databases of customers and members. To allow copyright to restrict the ability of Canadians to distribute, collect and aggregate their postal codes – which is all Geolytica has done – would have severely detrimental consequences for the public interest. Individual postal codes are facts; the Copyright Act cannot be wielded to inhibit the application to these facts to downstream industry,
ingenuity and innovation. The harm to the public interest in fettering such industry, ingenuity and innovation, and depriving Canadians of their benefit, grossly out-balances any interest a copyright owner might forward in defense of such an assertion of rights.


It's only fair to share...
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterGoogle+Pin on Pinterestshare on TumblrShare on LinkedInShare on RedditEmail to someone

One thoughtful comment

  1. Normally I don’t learn post on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me to try and do so! Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thank you, very nice post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.