Author Archive

Update:

The Book “Fight Your Tickets: A Comprehensive Guide to Traffic Tickets” was originally released in the form of an eBook. There were numerous people who said that in additon to eBook, they would like to have a physical hardcopy book. Others stated that they didn’t appreciate eBooks and wanted to only have the hardcopy book.

In response to the demand for hardcopy book versions of “Fight Your Tickets: A Comprehensive Guide to Traffic Tickets”, Fight Your Tickets can now be picked up at the following locations:

World’s Biggest Book Store

20 Edward Street,
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1C9 Canada
(416) 977-7009

Store Hours:

Sunday ——–11:00am to 8:00pm
Monday——–9:00am to 10:00pm
Tuesday——–9:00am to 10:00pm
Wednesday—-9:00am to 10:00pm
Thursday——-9:00am to 10:00pm
Friday———–9:00am to 10:00pm
Saturday——–9:00am to 10:00pm

See location, press link

Travelling to the World’s Biggest Book Store:

T.T.C – go to Dundas Street subway stop (on the Yonge Line) and once off, walk up to Yonge Street and walk up (north) on Yonge Street for about 30 seconds. Edward Street is located just north of Dundas St. & Yonge St. on the west side of Yonge St. 20 Edward Street is huge red building and cannot missed or mistaken for another store.

or

Exit the Dundas St. subway and walk towards the Atrium on Bay. Once in the Atrium on Bay building, travel up the escalator and walk west towards the Post Office. There are exit doors within the Atrium on Bay to Edward Street. Once out the doors onto Edward Street, walk across the street and there stands the large red building on street level “World’s Biggest Book Store”

By Motor Vehicle:

Drive onto the street, but make sure you are legally parked on Edward Street at the “P” parking on the southside of Edward Street. There is no legal street parking for vehicles on the north side of Edward Street and you will receive a parking ticket, as the parking enforcement officers aggressively ticket motorists. If you want to shop and stay awhile, there is underground parking located in the Atrium on Bay, which can be accessed from the Edward Street entrance/exit. When you come out of the parking lot, you will be in the Atrium on Bay and can access Edward Street from the second (2nd) floor of the Atrium on Bay beside the Post Office.

Where is the book, “Fight Your Tickets: A Comprehensive Guide to Traffic Tickets” located within the World’s Biggest Book Store?

Go through the entrance located at 20 Edward Street. As you walk in, you’ll notice an escalator travelling up to the second (2nd) floor. Take the escalator up and upon reaching the second (2nd) floor and walking off of the escalator, turn right and right again, and walk towards the SCIENCE/NATURE sign. Keep walking and against the wall you will see an automotive section. Beside the automotive section, is a section called “Legal Reference”. Go to the legal reference section and you will find the book on the middle shelf.

Upon locating the book and picking it up, you can then proceed to the escalator travelling down to the first floor. Turn left and left again and walk towards the cashiers (and there are several) at the front of the store.

The book retails for less than the price of a ticket, at twenty four ninety five ($24.95).

If you have any problems finding your way in the store, there are courteous staff always looking to assist you.

Federal Publications Inc.

425 University Avenue
Suite 401 – 4th floor
Toronto, ON M5G1T6
(416) 860-1611
Store Hours:

9:00 a.m. – 5:30 p.m – Monday to Friday

Travelling to Federal Publications Inc.:

T.T.C- Get off at St. Patrick on the University/Spadina Line at the southeast corner of University Avenue and Dundas Street West. Walk south on east side University Ave, just south of Dundas Street and it is the second building on your left. 425 University Avenue. Once in the building, press the up button on the elevator and once inside press 4. When you exit on the 4th floor, you will see Federal Publications directly in front of you (suite 401) and walk inside. Turn to your left and you’ll see shelves of different books. Walk towards the law section and adjacent to it is shelving with Wills & Probates and Do-It-Yourself Forms. Fight Your Tickets: A Comprehensive Guide to Traffic Tickets is just above that section.

The staff inside are friendly and knowledgeable and will assist you. Federal Publications is celebrating its 25th year and I have enjoyed this store for 21 of its’ 25 years.

or

By Motor Vehicle

You can drive to the University and Dundas Street location and look for parking. Many people just park at the City Hall Parking found under Nathan Phillips Square and walk up. Beneath Nathan Phillips Square is one of the world’s largest underground parking garages, with space for 2,400 motor vehicles to park.

If you can’t travel to the bookstore, you can order this Book from Federal Publications:

Ordering
- Find an item
- Order online
- Order by phone
- Order by fax
- Order by mail

Take a look at “Fight Your Tickets: A Comprehensive Guide to Traffic Tickets” at Federal Publications.

See a review of  Federal Publications Inc.


If You Want to Order it Online:

If you want to order the hard copy version of this book and have it mailed to you, the book can be ordered online from: Amazon.com or LuLu.com

Comments No Comments »

Update: see previous page

Bribery of Officers and Attempting to Obstruct Justice (by attempting to bribe a police officer)

Both of the Offences listed above are criminal offences covered by the Criminal Code of Canada (See PART IV – OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND JUSTICE)

Bribery is a serious offence, both for the person or business offering the bribe, and for the individual or business accepting the bribe.

The conviction of a bribery charge carries with it, a potential jail sentence of fourteen (14) years (see section 120 of the Criminal Code below). The lesser charge of attempting to obstruct justice through the act of bribery, carries with it, a potential jail sentence of two (2) years or ten (10) years, depending on the severity of the act and the context in which the crime is carried out (see section 139 of the Criminal Code below)

There are motorists who offer police officers and court officials bribes, in an effort to ensure that the charge (s) they may potentially fact, go away. This form of corruption is frowned upon by all that are sworn to enforce the laws of the land. One of the reasons that officials in this capacity are well compensated, is to ensure that they will not be tempted by bribes, by those who would initiate this type of criminal conduct. OPP officers earn a good living and are the only police force in Ontario with a pension plan (50/30). Many Justices of the Peace in Ontario earned more than $260,000.00 in 2008 (this doesn’t include benefits).

If a motorist attempts to bribe a police officer, in relation to a particular charge, he/she should not be surprised when they are charged with the original charge, along with additional criminal charge(s). Often the criminal charge is much more serious, then the charge that the motorist was attempting to avoid.

Case in point: (see story)

A Toronto resident, 28 year old Mr. Yu Zhao, was pulled over on December 18, 2009 while speeding (travelling 160 km/h on a highway with a posted speed limit of 100 km/h) on Highway 416. As a result of travelling 60 km/h greater than the allowable speed, the OPP officer charged him with stunt driving.

Faced with huge fine, a suspension of his driver’s licence, the impoundment of his motor vehicle and the accumulation of six (6) demerit points and a considerable increase in his auto-insurance premiums or the loss of his auto insurance; Mr. Zhao offered the OPP Officer ($50) fifty dollars.

In response to the Mr. Zhao’s stunt, the OPP officer charged Mr. Zhao with stunt driving under section 172.1 of  the Ontario Highway Traffic Act and and also with the more serious charge of Bribery under section 120 of the Criminal Code.

The OPP officer was “quite taken aback by it and told him to put his money away and charged him,” Zhao’s lawyer, Mr. Richard Addelman, told the East Region, Ontario Court Justice, The Honourable Justice Jack D. Nadelle.

On Thursday, May 27, 2010 Mr. Yu Zhao plead guilty to the reduced charge (from “bribery” to  “attempting to obstruct justice”) of attempting to obstruct justice.

As a result of this incident, Mr. Zhao was subjected to the following:

  • He was charged with stunt driving and bribery
  • His Ontario Driver’s Licence was suspended for a week
  • His motor vehicle was taken away from him and was towed to the impoundment lot
  • He had to pay for the costs associated with the impoundment of his vehicle
  • He was convicted of this offence and was given a seven hundred ($700.00) fine
  • He accumulated six (6) demerit points on his Ontario Driver’s Licence
  • His auto insurance will skyrocket or will be revoked by his current private insurance company
  • On May 27, 2010 his criminal matter was dealt with and he agreed to plead guilty to a lesser offence of “attempting to obstruct justice”. As a result Justice Nadelle sentenced Mr. Zhao to the following:

  • He was criminally convicted of attempting to obstruct justice (as opposed to the more serious offence of “bribery”)
  • He was given an hour of community service for every dollar he used in the bribe attempt ($50 = 5o hours of community service)
  • He was handed down a “conditional discharge”
  • He was placed on three (3) months probation
  • He was ordered to pay a $50.00 victim fine surcharge.If Mr. Zhao keeps his money in his pockets and is not involved in any of these types of incidents in the near future, the conviction won’t remain on his criminal record.
  • Bribery of Officers

    120. Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years who:

    (a) being a justice, police commissioner, peace officer, public officer or officer of a juvenile court, or being employed in the administration of criminal law, directly or indirectly, corruptly accepts, obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain, for themselves or another person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent

    (i) to interfere with the administration of justice,

    (ii) to procure or facilitate the commission of an offence, or

    (iii) to protect from detection or punishment a person who has committed or who intends to commit an offence; or

    (b) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives or offers to a person mentioned in paragraph (a), or to anyone for the benefit of that person, any money, valuable consideration, office, place or employment with intent that the person should do anything mentioned in subparagraph (a)(i), (ii) or (iii).

    R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 120; 2007, c. 13, s. 4

    Obstructing Justice

    139 (1) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding,

    (a) by indemnifying or agreeing to indemnify a surety, in any way and either in whole or in part, or

    (b) where he is a surety, by accepting or agreeing to accept a fee or any form of indemnity whether in whole or in part from or in respect of a person who is released or is to be released from custody,

    (c) is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

    (d) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

    (2) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner other than a manner described in subsection (1) to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.

    (3) Without restricting the generality of subsection (2), every one shall be deemed wilfully to attempt to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice who in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed,

    (a) dissuades or attempts to dissuade a person by threats, bribes or other corrupt means from giving evidence;

    (b) influences or attempts to influence by threats, bribes or other corrupt means a person in his conduct as a juror; or

    (c) accepts or obtains, agrees to accept or attempts to obtain a bribe or other corrupt consideration to abstain from giving evidence, or to do or to refrain from doing anything as a juror. R.S., c. C-34, s. 127; R.S., c. 2(2nd Supp.), s. 3; 1972, c. 13, s. 8.

    There are Different Forms of Bribery and they don’t always involve the exchange of monies:

    In this particular case, the Immigration Judge attempted to coerce a refugee claimant into having sex with him. In 2006 the refugee claimant met with the Judge (who had presided over her hearing and had not yet made a decision on her application) and taped the conversation (audio/video). The Immigration Judge was appointed to the Federal Immigration and Refugee Board in 2000. On April 20, 2010, the Immigration Judge was found guilty of a charge of bribery pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Breach of Trust. The former Immigration Judge faces five (5) years incarceration on each of the charges and will be sentenced by Ontario Superior Court Justice Madam Justice Thea P. Herman on Friday, June 4, 2010.

    Immigration and Refugee Protection Act 2001, c. 27

    Offences relating to officers

    129. (1) Every person is guilty of an offence who

    (a) being an officer or an employee of the Government of Canada, knowingly makes or issues any false document or statement, or accepts or agrees to accept a bribe or other benefit, in respect of any matter under this Act or knowingly fails to perform their duties under this Act;

    (b) gives or offers to give a bribe or consideration to, or makes an agreement or arrangement with, an officer to induce the officer not to perform their duties under this Act;

    (c) falsely personates an officer or by any act or omission leads any person to believe that the person is an officer; or

    (d) obstructs or impedes an officer in the performance of the officer’s duties under this Act.

    Punishment

    (2) Every person who is guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable(a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine of not more than $50,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years, or to both; or

    (b) on summary conviction, to a fine of not more than $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than six months, or to both.

    See the Code of Conduct for Members of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

    Update: July 23/10 – Ex-Immigration Judge Apologizes for Crime

    Update: July 29, 2010 – Former Immigration Judge and Toronto City Councillor has been sentenced to eighteen (18) months imprisonment.
    His lawyer is planning on appealing the verdict and sentence. The Judge presiding over his trial accepted that the former Immigration Judge suffers from biopolar disorder, but wasn’t persuaded that the former Immigration Judge was in a “hypermanic state” at the time that the Immigration Judge committed the crime and therefore should not be held culpable for the crime he committeed. The Judge presiding over the trial and sentencing today, said the defence established Ellis suffers from bipolar disorder that may have impaired his judgment but “he knew what he was doing was wrong. . . . This was not an impulsive act.”

    Comments No Comments »

    Update:

    Port, Starboard, Stern

    Port, Starboard, Stern

    Canada has:

  • The longest coastline in the world, with over 243,000 kilometres in coastline. Stretched out as a continuous line, it would circle the equator more than six times.
  • The world’s largest freshwater system — the country’s 2 million lakes and rivers cover 7.6 per cent of the land mass (755,000 square kilometres).
  • Canada’s Ferry services, carry about 40 million passengers and 17 million vehicles in Canada each year.
  • Canadians love the water and enjoy recreational boating, as do tourists who come to Canada to enjoy the country’s nature and beauty. According to Transport Canada, there are more than 100 recreational boating deaths in Canada a year.

    The Federal Government’s ten (10) year federal phase-in period to allow boat enthusiasts to participate in an examination in order to get their boating licence (formally referred to as a “Pleasure Craft Operator Card”) ended as of September 14, 2010. Effective September 15, 2010 it doesn’t matter what age you are, if you operate a boat (a motor of any size – that is powered by fuel or electricity) you will need the Card(as of April 1, 1999 a personal watercraft must be operated by someone who is at least 16 years old).

    You can take the multiple choice examination online and upon receiving a 75% pass, on the 36 questions posed, you can print the temporary card (which can accompany you on your boat) and a permanent card will be sent to you. The Card doesn’t have an expiration date and must carry the boater when they are operating a pleasure craft. If this licence doesn’t accompany the boater, they can be subjected to a heft fine of $250.00.

    Boaters scramble to obtain mandatory operator cards (see the story in the Star)

    According to Transport Canada – I to 3 million boaters have not yet passed their tests, despite the fact that the 10 year phase-in period concluded in September 2010.

    When marine police officers conduct boat safety checks this summer and fall, they will require boaters to produce their pleasure craft operator cards. Cards will be mandatory, at the risk of a fine of at least $250, for almost all Canadian operators of motorized pleasure boats.

    Because Canadians need never have set foot in a boat to obtain their cards, because renters are not required to get cards, because cards can never be revoked, and because the test can be taken online, critics say the system is a cash grab that does not actually improve boater safety.

    Pleasure Craft Licence:

    A pleasure craft licence is the set of identification numbers displayed on a pleasure craft.

    You must display the licence number above the waterline on both sides of your pleasure craft in block characters that:

    * are at least 7.5 centimetres (3 inches) high; and

    * in a colour that contrasts with the colour of the bow.

    The Small Vessel Regulations under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, require all pleasure craft powered by an engine 10 horsepower (7.5 kW) or more to have a pleasure craft licence, unless they have a vessel registration.

    You must carry a copy of your Pleasure Craft Licence on board.

    A Pleasure Craft Licence is different from a Vessel Registration. Check the Vessel Registration Office website for more information on registering your pleasure craft.

    Pleasure craft licences are free.

    Recent amendments to the Small Vessel Regulations have resulted in the following changes to the Pleasure Craft Licensing Process:

    • Owners of licensed pleasure craft now have up to 90 days from the date of purchase to transfer a pleasure craft licence. During which time you may continue to operate your pleasure craft with the existing licence and a copy of the transfer documents onboard.
    • Pleasure craft licences are valid for a period of 10 years. If there are changes to your name or address in that time, you must update your licence by applying to Service Canada.

    Service Canada delivers Pleasure Craft Licensing at all of their offices across Canada.

    The Pleasure Craft Licensing system allows Search and Rescue personnel to access the information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in the event of an emergency. This could mean the difference between life and death!

    Here are some additional links to Service Canada with regard to frequently asked questions about Pleasure Craft Licences:

    Application Information

    Forms

    Financial Information

    Contact Information

    Related Information

    The tests are provided by private companies, not the government. A list of accredited test providers can be found at this link .

    From Transport Canada:

    Pleasure Craft Operators

    drawing: pleasure craft  operator card being held up by a human hand

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Course Providers Database

    List of Certificates of Competency, Training Certificates and other Equivalencies as Proof of Competency when Operating a Pleasure Craft

    The Competency of Operators of Pleasure Craft Regulations require operators of pleasure craft fitted with a motor and used for recreational purposes to have proof of competency on board at all times.

    Proof of competency can take 1 of 3 forms:

    1. A Pleasure Craft Operator Card;
    2. Proof of having successfully completed a boating safety course in Canada prior to April 1, 1999; or,
    3. A completed rental-boat safety checklist.

    The operator card is good-for-life.

    These requirements are being phased in over ten years.

    Date at which proof of competency is required *

    How this applies to operators** of pleasure craft fitted with a motor and used for recreational purposes:

    • All operators born after April 1, 1983, proof of competency required on board by September 15, 1999.
    • All operators of craft under 4 m in length, including personal watercraft, proof of competency required on board by September 15, 2002.
    • All operators, proof of competency required on board by September 15, 2009.

    * These requirements apply in areas outside the Northwest and Nunavut Territories at this time.

    ** Applies to non-residents operating their pleasure craft in Canadian waters after 44 consecutive days. Operator card or equivalent issued to a non-resident by their state or country will be considered as proof of competency.

    If you hold any certificate on the List of Certificates of Competency, Training Certificates and other Equivalencies as Proof of Competency when Operating a Pleasure Craft, you already meet the requirements of the Competency of Operators of Pleasure Craft Regulations – you just need to make sure you carry your certificate on board. Proof of certification may include original documentation or a copy of the certificate.

    Competency of Operators of Pleasure Craft Regulations

    Offences and Associated Fines

    Here is a list of some boating offences along with the associated fines.

    Boating Offence———————————————————-$$Fine$$*

    Allowing someone under age (under 16) to operate a boat ———- $ 250.00

    Not having the required proof of competency on board ————- $ 250.00

    Not having the required Pleasure Craft Licence on board ———– $ 250.00

    Not having enough approved lifejackets on board ——————– $ 200.00

    Careless operation ———————————————————- $ 200.00

    Speeding ———————————————————————- $ 100.00

    Operating a boat if you are under age (under 16) ———————- $ 100.00

    Operating a boat without a working muffler in good condition —— $ 100.00

    Towing someone without a spotter ————————————— $ 100.00

    *Not including administrative charges

    You should also know that some boating offences can result in fines to both the operator of the boat as well as to the person who allowed the operation of the boat. An example of this would be allowing someone under the age of 16 to operate your PWC.

    You can find a complete list of boating offences and fines under the Contraventions Regulations by visiting www.boatingsafety.gc.ca.

    Comments No Comments »

    Update: See previous page

    Each jurisdiction has its own laws with respect to the rules of the road.  In order to be licenced, a driver must familiarize themselves with the laws of the place where they are licenced.  Most driver’s are aware of the laws of the road in their immediate jurisdiction.

    If driver’s travel outside of their home jurisdiction, then the laws and the rules of the road change.  The fact that a driver doesn’t know the laws at the place that they are visiting or driving through, will make little difference with police or the courts. Both mistake of law and ignorance of the law are not defences to a traffic charge and won’t assist a motorist who challenges his or her ticket(s).

    If you are convicted of an offence outside of your home jurisdiction, then the laws and consequences of that jurisdiction will apply to you, even if you don’t reside there.  The authorities have your information at their fingertips (your driver’s licence, your insurance documentation, your vehicle registration and licence plate, etc).

    Here is a definition of “reciprocity” according to the Compact Oxford English Dictionary:
    reciprocity
    ressi-pross-iti
    • noun – the practice of exchanging things with others for mutual benefit.

    Provinces, Territories, States and Other Countries have signed “Reciprocal Agreements” with each other, which benefits each signatory to the agreement. Even though all Provinces, Territories, States and countries have different laws, many agreements have been signed (reciprocal agreements) between these Provinces, Territories, States and other countries, to ensure that their laws are respected and enforced in the other Provinces, Territories, States and countries.

    Example:
    If you are convicted of an offence in New York, which has a fine and demerit points attached to that conviction – that conviction can be enforced in Ontario. Your licence can be suspended in Ontario for that conviction in New York and until you pay the New York fine, your Ontario licence will remain suspended. New York and Ontario have a reciprocal agreement in this area. Convictions for certain violations in Michigan and New York licence will remain suspended. This can only legally happen, if actually have the potential of having points be applied to your license.

    It is important to know that convictions in other jurisdictions, can revisit you in your home jurisdiction, with all of the consequences associated with that conviction, in your home jurisdiction. This could include licence suspensions, fines, accumulation of demerit points and auto insurance increases.

    On May 18, 2010, it was announced that there exists an outstanding amount of a billion dollars in unpaid traffic tickets in the Province of Ontario. Ontario Legislative Assembly’s NDP M.P.P, Mr. Peter Kormos, said the following, (upon hearing the news of the deficit in Ontario, due to motorists not paying their traffic ticket fines) If we have this problem, others do too … It is in everyone’s interests to develop reciprocal agreements.” Governments have come to realize that unless they have solid legal grounds to collect on unpaid traffic fines from other jurisdictions, any effort expended to collect on unpaid traffic fines, will utlimately end in futility and waste precious resources in the process.

    The following describes each Province and Territory and some of the Reciprocal Agreements that they have with each Province, Territory, State and other Countries. Due to the fact that reciprocal agreements are constantly evolving and being negotiated and signed off and/or being amended/modified, the list is only current as of the published date of this post:

    Alberta -Traffic Safety Act

    Motor Transport Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. M-21

    Exchanging a Non-Canadian Driver’s Licence

    Driver Licensing in Alberta

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.A. 2002, c. I-3.5 Consolidated Statutes of Alberta

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Alberta

    Alberta’s reciprocating jurisdictions

    Alberta has the same reciprocal enforcement agreements under the ISO Act that it had under the REMO Act. Reciprocal agreements exist with all other provinces and territories of Canada, the United States and the following other jurisdictions:

    American Samoa Guam Poland
    Australia Isle of Man Puerto Rico
    Austria Jersey Scotland
    Barbados New Zealand Singapore
    Czech Republic Northern Ireland Slovak Republic
    England Northern Mariana Island South Africa
    Fiji Islands Norway Virgin Islands
    Germany Papua New Guinea Wales

    If an Alberta applicant wishes to vary a support order and the respondent no longer lives in a reciprocating jurisdiction, the ISO Act provides that the Alberta court can hear the variation application if the respondent has been given notice of the proceeding.

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Alberta has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Operator Licensing and Vehicle Control Regulation, Alta. Reg. 320/2002, (Traffic Safety Act) Consolidated Regulations of Alberta

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas, Alberta and others

    Insurance Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. I-3 Consolidated Statutes of Alberta

    Alberta has Reciprocal Licensing Agreements with the following countries:

  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • England
  • France
  • Germany
  • Japan
  • Republic of Korea
  • Scotland
  • Switzerland
  • United States
  • Wales
  • Canada-UK Driving Licences

    Alberta has Reciprocal Agreements (with regard to child support) with Canadian Provinces/Territories, all American States/Territories and other countries.

    The Alberta (Partners in Compliance) PIC program is close to having a reciprocal agreement in place with B.C.’s Green Light Transportation System< /a>

    Alberta’s Reciprocal and Non-Reciprocal Licensing for Out-of-Country Motor Vehicle Drivers.



    British Columbia -Motor Vehicle Act

    Commercial Transport Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 58 Consolidated Statutes of British Columbia

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.B.C. 2002, c. 29 Consolidated Statutes of British Columbia

    Commercial Transport Regulations, B.C. Reg. 30/78, (Commercial Transport Act) Consolidated Regulations of British Columbia

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    British Columbia has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  British Columbia

    Parking When You Travel to BC’s Lower Mainland – Accessibility/Mobility

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas, British Columbia and others

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Motor Vehicle Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 318 Consolidated Statutes of British Columbia

    Insurance (Vehicle) Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 231 Consolidated Statutes of British Columbia



    Manitoba: Highway Traffic Act

    The Inter-jurisdictional Support Orders Act, C.C.S.M. c. I60 Consolidated Statutes of Manitoba

    Drivers and Vehicles Act, C.C.S.M. c. D104 Consolidated Statutes of Manitoba

    Highway Traffic Act, C.C.S.M. c. H60 Consolidated Statutes of Manitoba

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Insurance Act, C.C.S.M. c. I40 Consolidated Statutes of Manitoba part one & part two

    Automobile Insurance Certificates and Rates Regulation, Man. Reg. 35/2006

    Charges for Licences, Registrations, Permits and Other Services Regulation, Man. Reg. 42/2006, (Highway Traffic Act) Consolidated Regulations of Manitoba

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Manitoba

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas, Manitoba  and others

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Manitoba Public Insurance – Driver Licensing

    Manitoba has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Commercial vehicle owners in several communities on both sides of the Saskatchewan-Manitoba border will benefit from a new vehicle registration agreement for commercial vehicles

    The new reciprocal agreement will allow commercial trucks, buses and taxis to operate within 16 km of the Saskatchewan-Manitoba border without having to pay for two vehicle registrations or a single trip permit.

    Manitoba participates in the ECMT (recognition of parking badges) reciprocal agreement

    Reciprocal Agreement between Manitoba and North Dakota – Farm registered vehicles owned or operated by farmers or ranchers of either state hauling their own farm products, farm supplies, or farm equipment within 20 miles of the ND/MB border are not required to purchase registration from the other state.

    Automobile Insurance Certificates and Rates Regulation, Man. Reg. 24/2010, (Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act) Consolidated Regulations of Manitoba

    Canada-UK Driving Licences



    New Brunswick: Motor Vehicle Act

    Motor Carrier Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, c. M-16 Consolidated Statutes of New Brunswick

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.N.B. 2002, c. I-12.05 Consolidated Statutes of New Brunswick

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application Outside New Brunswick

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    New Brunswick has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  New Brunswick  and others

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    General Regulation, N.B. Reg. 83-42, (Motor Vehicle Act) Consolidated Regulations of New Brunswick

    An Act Respecting the Convention Between Canada and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Providing For the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, S.N.B. 1984, c. R-4.1 Consolidated Statutes of New Brunswick

    Insurance Act, R.S.N.B. 1973, c. I-12 Consolidated Statutes of New Brunswick



    Newfoundland & Labrador: Highway Traffic Act

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.N.L. 2002, c. I-19.2 Consolidated Statutes of Newfoundland and Labrador

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of Newfoundland and Labrador

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Newfoundland and Labrador has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    International Registration Plan

    Highway Traffic Driver Regulations, 1999, N.L.R. 110/98, (Highway Traffic Act) Regulations of Newfoundland and Labrador

    Canada and the United Kingdom Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. C-3 Consolidated Statutes of Newfoundland and Labrador

    Insurance Companies Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. I-10 Consolidated Statutes of Newfoundland and Labrador

    Reciprocal Agreement with France

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas, Newfoundland & Labrador and others

    Highway Traffic Act, R.S.N.L. 1990, c. H-3 Consolidated Statutes of Newfoundland and Labrador

    Canada-UK Driving Licences



    Northwest Territories: Motor Vehicles Act

    Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments (Canada-U.K.) Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. R-2 Consolidated Statutes of the Northwest Territories — Northwest Territories

    Insurance Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. I-4 Consolidated Statutes of the Northwest Territories — Northwest Territories

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Northwest Territories

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Accessibility for People with Reduced Mobility – Reciprocal Agreements

    Northwest Territories has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Vital Statistics – Birth Database – Reciprocal Agreement with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Reciprocal Enforcement Of Judgments Act, R.S.N.W.T. (Nu.) 1988, c. R-1

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas, Northwest Territories and others

    Motor Vehicles Act, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c. M-16 Consolidated Statutes of the Northwest Territories — Northwest Territories



    Nova Scotia: Motor Vehicle Act

    Handicapped Parking – Reciprocating States, N.S. Reg. 212/89

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Nova Scotia has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Judgments – Reciprocating States Regulations, N.S. Reg. 26/62

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  Nova Scotia  and others

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of Nova Scotia

    Owner’s Permit and License Fees for Foreign Government Employees and Vehicles Regulations, N.S. Reg. 208/2006



    Nunavut: Motor Vehicles Act, R.S.N.W.T

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Nunavut has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.Nu. 2002, c. 26 Consolidated Statutes of Nunavut — Nunavut

    Reciprocal Enforcement Of Judgments (canada U.k.) Act, R.S.N.W.T. (Nu.) 1988, c. R-2 Consolidated Statutes of Nunavut — Nunavut

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Nunavut

    Motor Vehicles Act, R.S.N.W.T. (Nu.) 1988, c. M-16 Consolidated Statutes of Nunavut — Nunavut




    Ontario: Highway Traffic Act

    Ontario has reciprocal driver’s licence exchange agreements with Australia, Austria, Belgium, France, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, Korea, Switzerland, the United States and all Canadian jurisdictions.

    Driver Licence Examinations, O. Reg. 341/94

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Ontario

    Reciprocal Suspension of Driver’s Licence, O. Reg. 37/93

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Ontario has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  Ontario  and others

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Reciprocal Suspension of Licences, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 607

    January 25, 2010: A new agreement between Ontario and Australia will allow new residents to exchange their valid driver’s licence upon relocation, without having to take a knowledge or road test.

    From the Ontario Highway Traffic Act:

    PART XIII
    SUSPENSION FOR FAILURE TO PAY JUDGMENTS OR MEET SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS

    Section 198.4

    Reciprocal effect of subs. (1) with states having similar legislation

    (4) The Lieutenant Governor in Council, upon the report of the Minister that a province or state has enacted legislation similar in effect to subsection (1) and that the legislation extends and applies to judgments rendered and become final against residents of that province or state by any court of competent jurisdiction in Ontario, may declare that subsection (1) shall extend and apply to judgments rendered and become final against residents of Ontario by any court of competent jurisdiction in the province or state. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 198 (4).

    Canada-UK Driving Licences

    Exchanging an Out-Of-Province Driver’s Licence – see DriveTest website.



    Prince Edward Island: Highway Traffic Act

    Reciprocal Agreement signed with Northern Ireland and The Isle of Man

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. I-4.2 Consolidated Statutes of Prince Edward Island

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Prince Edward Island

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Prince Edward Island has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  Prince Edward Island  and others

    Canada-United Kingdom Judgments Recognition Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. C-1 Consolidated Statutes of Prince Edward Island

    Highway Traffic Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. H-5 Consolidated Statutes of Prince Edward Island

    Insurance Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. I-4 Consolidated Statutes of Prince Edward Island



    Quebec: Highway Safety Code:

    Quebec 222 (1) For the purposes of subsection (6) of Section 214, the Province of Quebec is and is deemed to be “a jurisdiction in which recourse of a substantially similar character to that provided by this Act is afforded to residents in the Province”. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 213 and 214, the Régie de l’assurance automobile du Québec may, in the exercise of its rights of subrogation under the Automobile Insurance Act (Quebec), claim from Judgment Recovery (N.S.) Ltd. any amount which a resident of Quebec would be entitled to receive from Judgment Recovery (N.S.) Ltd. if the Régie had paid nothing to the Quebec resident.(3) Except as provided by Section 256, for the purpose of asserting its rights under subsection (2) against Judgment Recovery (N.S.) Ltd., the Régie shall commence a proceeding in its own name against the person liable for the damages, and the Régie, the defendant and Judgment Recovery (N.S.) Ltd. shall deal with the claim as provided in Sections 213 to 220 as if the proceeding were commenced by the Quebec resident.(4) This Section comes into force on and not before the effective date of an agreement between the Régie and the Province entered into pursuant to Section 319 of the Insurance Act, and applies to accidents occurring on, from and after that date. R.S., c. 293, s. 222.


    Reciprocal commercial vehicle registration agreements between the Gouvernement du Québec and certain American states, Regulation respecting, 1984 G.O.Q. 2, 3608 and 1985 G.O.Q. 2, 2090

    Reciprocal Agreement between the Gouvernement du Québec and the Governement of the State of Maine concerning drivers’ licenses and traffic offenses, Regulation respecting a, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.2.2

    Reciprocal Agreement between the Province of Ontario and Québec concerning Drivers’ Licences and Traffic Offences, Regulation respecting a, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.4

    Reciprocal Agreement between the State of New York and Québec concerning Drivers’ Licences and Traffic Offenses, Regulation respecting the, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.2

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  Quebec  and others

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Reciprocal Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the Gouvernement du Québec and the Government of Japan concerning the exchange of driver’s licences, Regulation respecting a, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.2.01

    Reciprocal Agreement on driver’s licence exchange between the Government of Québec and the Government of the Swiss Confederation, Regulation Giving effect to the, O.C. 363-2006, 2006 G.O. 2, 1457

    Reciprocal agreement on driver’s licence exchange between the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, Regulation respecting a, O.C. 547-2006, 2006 G.O. 2, 1927

    Reciprocal agreement on driver’s licence exchange between the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec and the National Police Agency of the Republic of Korea, Regulation respecting a, O.C. 471-2001, 2001 G.O. 2, 2171

    Agreement between the Gouvernement du Québec and the Government of the State of New York respecting the mechanical inspection of buses, Regulation respecting an, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.2.1

    Agreement on driver’s licence exchange between the Gouvernement du Québec and the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium, Regulation giving effect to an, O.C. 860-2003, 2003 G.O. 2, 2721

    Reciprocal Agreement between the State of Florida and the Government of Québec concerning Driver Licenses and Traffic Offenses, Regulation respecting a, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.1.1

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Quebec

    Exchange of driver’s licences between the Gouvernement du Québec and the Gouvernement de la République française, Regulation concerning the, R.Q. c. C-24.1, r.4.2

    Reciprocal commercial vehicle registration agreements between the Gouvernement du Québec and certain American states, Regulation respecting, 1984 G.O.Q. 2, 3608 and 1985 G.O.Q. 2, 2090

    Reciprocal Agreement between the State of Florida and the Government of Québec concerning Driver Licenses and Traffic Offenses, Regulation respecting a, R.Q. c. C-24.2, r.0.1.1.1

    Canada-UK Driving Licences



    Saskatchewan: Highway Traffic Act

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Reciprocal Agreement between Saskatchewan and North Dakota – All Saskatchewan licensed vehicles are exempted from the 72-hour trip permit requirements if the movement is an interstate operation and made within the 20 miles of the ND/SK border.

    Saskatchewan has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    The Reciprocal Agreement allows Commercial Trucks, Buses and Taxis to operate within 16 km of the Saskatchewan-Manitoba border without having to pay for two vehicle registrations or a single trip permit.

    Traffic Safety Act Fees Regulations, R.R.S. c. T-18.1 Reg. 3

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Reciprocity Agreements between Texas,  Saskatchewan  and others

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Inter-jurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.S. 2002, c. I-10.03

    Automobile Accident Insurance (General) Regulations, 2002, R.R.S. c. A-35 Reg.

    Canada-United Kingdom Judgments Enforcement Act, S.S. 1988-89, c. C-0.1 Consolidated Statutes of Saskatchewan — Saskatchewan

    Traffic Safety Act, S.S. 2004, c. T-18.1

    Saskatchewan Insurance Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. S-26

    Automobile Accident Insurance Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. A-35

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Saskatchewan

    Enforcement of Maintenance Orders Act, 1997, S.S. 1997, c. E-9.21

    Registration Exemption and Reciprocity Regulations, 1987, R.R.S. c. H-3.1 Reg. 4

    The Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act, 1996

    Traffic Safety Act, S.S. 2004, c. T-18.1 Consolidated Statutes of Saskatchewan

    Saskatchewan Insurance Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. S-26 Consolidated Statutes of Saskatchewan

    Canada-UK Driving Licences



    Yukon Territory – Motor Vehicle Act

    Reciprocal Enforcement of Maintenance Orders Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 191 Statutes of Yukon — Yukon

    Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act, S.Y. 2001, c. 19 Statutes of Yukon — Yukon

    DriveTest – Driver Examination Centres, Reciprocal Agreements

    Driver Licensing – Domestic and international (CCMTA)

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges

    Yukon has Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements with the United States

    Hong Kong & Singapore – Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements

    Making a Support or Support Variation Application outside of  Yukon Territory

    Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments (U.K.) Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 190 Statutes of Yukon — Yukon

    Motor Vehicles Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 153 Statutes of Yukon — Yukon

    Insurance Act, R.S.Y. 2002, c. 119 Statutes of Yukon — Yukon

    Periodic Commercial Motor Vehicle Inspection (PMVI) Program Information

    Agreement between the State of Texas and the Yukon -see page 122



    Countries with which Provinces and Territories Have Reciprocal Enforcement Arrangements: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

    Reciprocal Agreements with other Provinces/Territories and with other Countries, with respect to Disabled Parking Permits/Badges and the Use of those Permits/Badges in other Jurisdictions:

    Provincial/Territorial Participation in the ECMT Agreement on Reciprocal Recognition of Disabled Parking Badges/Permits. See the agreements for each of the Provinces and Territories listed:

    * British Columbia
    * Alberta
    * Saskatchewan
    * Manitoba
    * Ontario
    * Quebec
    * New Brunswick
    * Nova Scotia
    * Prince Edward Island
    * Newfoundland
    * Northwest Territories
    * Yukon
    * Nunavut

    Here is the the mutual recognition agreement of parking permits for persons with disabilities between Canada and European Countries..

    Accessibility for People with Reduced Mobility Reciprocal Recognition of Parking Badges: through this link you will find where you can or cannot park with your disabled permit/badge displayed.

    Foreign Driver Licence Exchange Status (as of May 6, 2009 – see CCMTA chart) See the CCMTA’s  main  website for frequently asked questions (FAQ’s).

    “International Driver Permit”
    Road signs are written in Dutch in the Flemish region.

    “International Driver Permit” Canadians living in Belgium should be aware that neither a Canadian driver’s licence nor an International Driver Permit (IDP) are recognized. Only an Alberta, New Brunswick, Ontario or Quebec driver’s licence can be exchanged for a Belgian driver’s licence. Residents of provinces other than Alberta, New Brunswick, Ontario and Quebec should contact their provincial licence authorities to see whether they plan to negotiate reciprocal recognition arrangements with Belgium. To obtain a Belgian driver’s licence, you must pass all local courses and tests, both theoretical and practical. It may take from six months to a year to be able to drive legally and unaccompanied.

    Provincial & Territorial Licence Regulations for Recreational Vehicles

    Comments No Comments »

    Update:

    See the story and poll results featured in the Globe and Mail, written by Peter Cheney

    Globe Drive commissioned a poll with Harris-Decima and below are the results reflected in a some graphs and other poll findings. The poll included interviewing 1000 Canadians.

    Based on the survey, Ontario is the road rage capital of Canada, closely followed by Quebec and Alberta. If cut off by another driver, some 29% of Ontario drivers said they would honk the horn, while 14% would shout profanities or gesture.

    But in the Atlantic provinces only seven per cent said they would shout or make gestures; which made sense to me. I spend a lot of time in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and if you’re looking to get ticked off on the road, this isn’t the right place – the traffic isn’t thick enough to work up a decent rage, and the people are too laid back. Even if another driver does manage to get you enraged, the small population tends to act as a governing mechanism – no matter how badly a driver ticks you off, you hold back, since you might be seeing them later.

    In national traffic hellholes like Calgary or Toronto, things are different. Here, you are lost in the crowd – when you deliver a digital salute on the 401 or the Deerfoot Trail, you can safely assume you’ll never encounter the recipient again.

    If you want to be road-rage free, you might consider moving to Manitoba or Saskatchewan. The Harris-Decima poll found that 74 per cent of drivers there would simply let it go if another driver cut them off. Again, this made sense. I spent a couple of weeks in Saskatoon on a story once, and it was one of the most soothing driving experiences of my life. My fellow drivers and I cruised beneath the giant blue dome of the prairie sky, and we always seemed to have more than enough room – like yachts sailing the infinity of the Pacific, we occasionally glimpsed each other, but that was all.

    There were also strong regional differences when it came to road rage provoked by talking or texting at the wheel. In Alberta, 76 per cent of the drivers surveyed cited talking or texting as a factor. In Ontario, the figure was only 56 per cent. The difference is easily explained – Ontario has banned hand-held phones, Alberta hasn’t.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________

    Trish McAlaster/The Globe and Mail. Source: Harris/Decima

    Other poll findings

    • Drivers with highest incomes ($100,000-plus) are the least likely to let it go if someone cuts them off (57%) and the most likely to shout or make gestures (15%).
    • Women (64%) are only slightly more likely than men (60%) to ignore it if someone cuts them off.
    • Drivers using handheld devices are the biggest concern to 58% of respondents, way ahead of elderly drivers (10%), teenage drivers (8%) and cyclists (6%).
    • Women are more likely than men to be bothered by other drivers talking on the phone or texting – 62% vs. 54%.
    • Drivers in Alberta, where handheld devices are still legal when driving, are most likely (76%) to name them as their biggest concern.
    • Men are much more likely (18%) than women (8%) to name bad traffic as the thing than aggravates them most when driving. Women’s biggest bugbear (14%) is being cut off by another driver.

    Ontario woman is arrested over “Seat Belt Rage”. Seat Belt violations have increased to $240.00 and two (2) demerit points.

    Comments No Comments »